Conflicts:
- `.github/workflows/build-image.yml`:
Upstream updated `docker/build-push-action`, and we a different config
for `docker/metadata-action` so the lines directly above were different,
but it's not a real conflict.
Upgraded `docker/build-push-action` as upstream did.
- `app/javascript/mastodon/features/compose/components/compose_form.js`:
Upstream changed the codestyle near a line we had modified to accommodate
configurable character count.
Kept our change.
Conflicts:
- `config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb`:
Our config file is pretty different from upstream.
Upstream changed CSP directive `script-src` to include
`wasm-unsafe-eval` instead of `unsafe-eval`, which we
did not include.
Added `wasm-unsafe-eval` to `script-src` to fix
execution of the OCR web worker.
- `package.json`:
Upstream updated a dependency (`array-includes`) textually
adjacent to a glitch-soc-only dependency (`atrament`).
Updated `array-includes` as upstream did.
Conflicts:
- `app/models/account.rb`:
Conflict because we (glitch-soc) have disabled trending of posts without
review.
Discarded that upstream change.
- `app/views/admin/settings/discovery/show.html.haml`:
Just an extra setting in glitch-soc.
Kept that extra setting.
Conflicts:
- `app/javascript/mastodon/features/compose/components/poll_form.js`:
glitch-soc change because of having changed the default number of
available poll options.
Applied upstream's changes while keeping glitch-soc's default number of
poll options.
- `public/oops.png`:
We had a minor graphics change, probably not worth diverging from upstream.
Took upstream version.
Conflicts:
- `package.json`:
Upstream updated `jest`, moving its config in a separate file.
This config was modified in glitch-soc, so the corresponding changes have
been ported to `jest.config.js`
* Bump version to 3.5.2
* Change some entries to be more clear
* Add some extra notes
* Fix line wrap
Co-authored-by: Eugen Rochko <eugen@zeonfederated.com>
Conflicts:
- `app/lib/formatter.rb`:
Upstream completely refactored the formatting code and removed that file,
while glitch-soc had code for Markdown and HTML toots.
Took upstream code, glitch-soc changes will be re-implemented on top of the
refactored classes in a later commit.
- `app/models/status.rb`:
Upstream refactored status edit handling and moved code to
`app/models/concerns/status_snapshot_concern.rb`.
Applied glitch-soc's changes to that file.
- `app/serializers/activitypub/note_serializer.rb`:
Not really a conflict, just a line added too close to one modified by
glitch-soc.
Applied upstream changes while keeping the glitch-soc-modified one.
- `app/services/update_status_service.rb`:
Not really a conflict, upstream modified a line adjacent to one added by
glitch-soc.
Applied upstream changes while keeping the glitch-soc line.
- `app/views/statuses/_simple_status.html.haml`:
Upstream refactored formatting, glitch-soc changed the markup slightly.
Applied upstream changes.
- `spec/lib/formatter_spec.rb`:
Upstream completely refactored the formatting code and removed that file,
while glitch-soc had code for Markdown and HTML toots.
Took upstream code, glitch-soc changes will be re-implemented on top of the
refactored classes in a later commit.
* Change references to tootsuite/mastodon to mastodon/mastodon
* Remove obsolete test fixture
* Replace occurrences of tootsuite/mastodon with mastodon/mastodon in CHANGELOG
And a few other places
Conflicts:
- `config/webpack/configuration.js`:
Upstream updated the `js-yaml` dependency, which changed how to call it.
Those changes conflicted because that code is pretty different in glitch-soc
which has to deal with its more complex theming system.
Proceeded to the same compatibility changes in glitch-soc's code.
- `package.json` and `yarn.lock`:
Not really a conflict, just glitch-soc-specific dependencies textually too
close to some dependencies updated upstream.
