Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Minor upstream change, our README is completely different.
Kept ours.
- `lib/tasks/assets.rake`:
glitch-soc has extra code to deal with its theming system,
upstream changed a line that exists in glitch-soc.
Applied upstream changes.
Conflicts:
- `.github/workflows/build-image.yml`:
Upstream updated `docker/build-push-action`, and we a different config
for `docker/metadata-action` so the lines directly above were different,
but it's not a real conflict.
Upgraded `docker/build-push-action` as upstream did.
- `app/javascript/mastodon/features/compose/components/compose_form.js`:
Upstream changed the codestyle near a line we had modified to accommodate
configurable character count.
Kept our change.
Conflicts:
- `config/i18n-tasks.yml`:
Upstream added new ignored strings, glitch-soc has extra ignored strings
because of the theming system.
Added upstream's changes.
* Fix /api/v1/admin/trends/tags using wrong serializer
Fix regression from #18641
* Only use `REST::Admin::TagSerializer` when the user can `manage_taxonomies`
* Fix admin trending hashtag component to not link if `id` is unknown
* Allow changing hide_collections setting with the api
This is currently only possible with app/controllers/settings/profiles_controller.rb
and is the only difference in the allowed parameter between the two controllers
* Fix the lint issue
* Use normal indent
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Discarded upstream changes: we have our own README
- `app/controllers/follower_accounts_controller.rb`:
Port upstream's minor refactoring
Conflicts:
- `app/models/concerns/domain_materializable.rb`:
Fixed a code style issue upstream in a PR that got merged in glitch-soc
earlier.
Changed the code to match upstream's.
Conflicts:
- `.github/workflows/build-image.yml`:
Upstream changed how docker images were built, including how
they were cached.
I don't know much about it, so applied upstream's changes.
- `app/controllers/admin/domain_blocks_controller.rb`:
The feature, that was in glitch-soc, got backported upstream.
It also had a few fixes upstream, so those have been ported!
- `app/javascript/packs/admin.js`:
Glitch-soc changes have been backported upstream. As a result,
some code from `app/javascript/core/admin.js` got added upstream.
Kept our version since our shared Javascript already has that feature.
- `app/models/user.rb`:
Upstream added something to distinguish unusable and unusable-because-moved
accounts, while glitch-soc considers moved accounts usable.
Took upstream's code for `functional_or_moved?` and made `functional?`
call it.
- `app/views/statuses/_simple_status.html.haml`:
Upstream cleaned up code style a bit, on a line that we had custom changes
for.
Applied upstream's change while keeping our change.
- `config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb`:
Upstream adopted one CSP directive we already had.
The conflict is because of our files being structurally different, but the
change itself was already part of glitch-soc.
Kept our version.
Conflicts:
- `app/views/admin/announcements/edit.html.haml`:
Upstream change too close to theming-related glitch-soc change.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/views/admin/announcements/new.html.haml`
Upstream change too close to theming-related glitch-soc change.
Ported upstream changes.
Conflicts:
- `app/models/account.rb`:
Conflict because we (glitch-soc) have disabled trending of posts without
review.
Discarded that upstream change.
- `app/views/admin/settings/discovery/show.html.haml`:
Just an extra setting in glitch-soc.
Kept that extra setting.
Conflicts:
- `app/models/custom_emoji.rb`:
Not a real conflict, just upstream changing a line too close to
a glitch-soc-specific validation.
Applied upstream changes.
- `app/models/public_feed.rb`:
Not a real conflict, just upstream changing a line too close to
a glitch-soc-specific parameter documentation.
Applied upstream changes.
Conflicts:
- `app/javascript/mastodon/features/compose/components/poll_form.js`:
glitch-soc change because of having changed the default number of
available poll options.
Applied upstream's changes while keeping glitch-soc's default number of
poll options.
- `public/oops.png`:
We had a minor graphics change, probably not worth diverging from upstream.
Took upstream version.
Conflicts:
- `app/javascript/mastodon/locales/ja.json`:
Upstream change too close to a glitch-soc-specific string.
The glitch-soc-specific string should not have been in this file, so it
has been moved to `app/javascript/flavours/glitch/locales/ja.js`.
- `app/javascript/packs/public.js`:
Upstream refactored a part, that as usual is split and duplicated in various
pack files. Updated those pack files accordingly.
- `app/views/layouts/application.html.haml`:
Upstream fixed custom.css path in a different way than we did, went with
upstream's change.
* Change featured tag updates to add/remove activity
* Fix to check for the existence of feature tag
* Rename service and worker
* Merge AddHashtagSerializer with AddSerializer
* Undo removal of sidekiq_options
* Add LIMIT of featured tag to instance API response
* Add featured_tags_collection_url to Account
* Add synchronization of remote featured tags
* Deliver update activity when updating featured tag
* Remove featured_tags_collection_url
* Revert "Add featured_tags_collection_url to Account"
This reverts commit cff349fc27b104ded2df6bb5665132dc24dab09c.
* Add hashtag sync from featured collections
* Fix tag name normalize
* Add target option to fetch featured collection
* Refactor fetch_featured_tags_collection_service
* Add LIMIT of featured tag to v1/instance API response
Cherry-picked d2528b26b6
Conflicts:
- `app/serializers/initial_state_serializer.rb`:
Upstream changed stuff, we had extra attributes.
Applied upstream changes while keeping our extra attributes.
- `app/serializers/rest/instance_serializer.rb`:
Upstream actually moved that to `app/serializers/rest/v1/instance_serializer.rb`,
so updated that file by keeping our extra attributes, and took upstream's
version of `app/serializers/rest/instance_serializer.rb`.
- `spec/views/about/show.html.haml_spec.rb`:
Took upstream's version.
In the absence of an opt-in to multiple specific languages in the
preferences, it makes more sense to filter by the user's presumed
language only (interface language or `lang` override)
