Conflicts:
- `yarn.lock`:
Not a real conflict, just a line adjacent to a glitch-soc only dependency
getting updated.
Updated dependencies as upstream did.
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/activitypub/collections_controller.rb`:
Upstream renamed a helper method everywhere.
There was one glitch-soc line involving changes because of the local-only post
feature.
Ported upstream's change.
Conflicts:
- `app/helpers/application_helper.rb`:
Not a real conflict, upstream added helpers right next to glitch-soc only
helpers.
Added upstream's helpers.
- `spec/models/status_spec.rb`:
Not a real conflict, upstream added specs right next to glitch-soc only
specs.
Added upstream's tests.
Conflicts:
- `app/controllers/accounts_controller.rb`:
Conflict due to glitch-soc's local-only posting feature.
Refactored as upstream did but kept local changes.
- `app/lib/account_statuses_filter.rb`:
Conflict due to glitch-soc's local-only posting feature.
Refactored as upstream did but kept local changes.
Conflicts:
- `spec/requests/api/v2/instance_spec.rb`:
Conflict due to glitch-soc having a different default site name.
Updated the tests as upstream did, keeping glitch-soc's default name.
Conflicts:
- `app/models/user_settings.rb`:
Upstream removed a setting textually adjacent to a glitch-soc-only setting.
Removed the setting glitch-soc removed.
Conflicts:
- `config/routes/api.rb`:
glitch-soc has an extra `:destroy` action on notifications for historical reasons.
Kept it for now, while otherwise updating as upstream did.
Conflicts:
- `.github/workflows/build-security.yml`:
Changes were already cherry-picked and adapted in glitch-soc.
Kept glitch-soc's version.
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Changes were already cherry-picked and updated further in glitch-soc.
Kept glitch-soc's version.
- `lib/mastodon/version.rb`:
Changes were already cherry-picked and updated further in glitch-soc.
Kept glitch-soc's version.
* Add env variable support for number of followable hashtags in feed column.
* Add a note about performance concerns for higher values.
See discussion in https://github.com/glitch-soc/mastodon/pull/2500
* Update .devcontainer/docker-compose.yml
---------
Co-authored-by: Claire <claire.github-309c@sitedethib.com>
Conflicts:
- `app/lib/content_security_policy.rb`:
Conflict caused by glitch-soc's support for the extra `EXTRA_DATA_HOSTS`
environment variable.
Ported upstream's changes while keeping support for `EXTRA_DATA_HOSTS`.
Conflicts:
- `.rubocop_todo.yml`:
Upstream fixed a bunch lint issues, and changed the `Max` parameter of the
`Metrics/AbcSize` cop.
Glitch-soc has different code and slightly higher `AbcSize` complexity,
modified the `.rubocop_todo.yml` file accordingly.
- `app/policies/status_policy.rb`:
Upstream changed `account.suspended?` to `account.unavailable?` to prepare
for delete flags. Glitch-soc has additional local-only conditions.
Ported upstream's refactor while keeping glitch-soc's additional condition.
- `app/serializers/initial_state_serializer.rb`:
Upstream refactored a bunch of stuff while glitch-soc has more settings.
Refactored as upstream did while keeping glitch-soc's settings.
Conflicts:
- `config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb`:
Upstream reworked the CSP, we kept our version for now.
- `spec/requests/content_security_policy_spec.rb`:
Upstream reworked the CSP, we kept our version for now.
Conflicts:
- `app/views/admin/custom_emojis/new.html.haml`:
Conflict caused by glitch-soc having a different file size limit constant
name.
Updated like upstream did while keeping glitch-soc's constant name.
Conflicts:
- `lib/sanitize_ext/sanitize_config.rb`:
Upstream enforced new code style rules, where we had different code.
Applied the new code style rules.
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Upstream has updated its README, we have a completely different one.
Kept ours.
- `app/views/auth/sessions/two_factor.html.haml`:
Upstream refactored stuff and the conflict is because of glitch-soc's theming
system.
Ported upstream changes while accounting for the different theming system.
Conflicts:
- `config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb`:
Upstream added some code to add the Identity Provider's sign-in endpoint to
the `form-action` Content Security Policy directive but our version of the
file is pretty different.
Ported the change.
Conflicts:
- `.github/workflows/build-releases.yml`:
Upstream changed comments close to a line we modified to account for
different container image repositories.
Updated the comments as upstream did.
Conflicts:
- `Vagrantfile`:
Upstream bumped a bunch of values, including one that was already bumped by
glitch-soc.
Took upstream's version.
- `lib/paperclip/transcoder.rb`:
glitch-soc already had a partial fix for this.
Took upstream's version.
Conflicts:
- `.rubocop_todo.yml`:
Upstream regenerated this file, glitch-soc had a specific ignore.
- `README.md`:
Upstream updated its README, but glitch-soc has a completely different one.
Kept glitch-soc's README
