Conflicts:
- `config/environments/production.rb`:
Upstream enforced a code style change and glitch-soc had a few different lines.
Applied upstream's code style to glitch-soc's changes.
Conflicts:
- `app/models/account.rb`:
Upstream added new validations close to lines on which glitch-soc had
modified validations to handle custom limits set through environment
variables.
Ported upstream changes.
- `config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb`:
Upstream added `AZURE_ALIAS_HOST`. Glitch-soc's version of the file is
completely different.
Added `AZURE_ALIAS_HOST` to our version of the file.
Conflicts:
- `.github/workflows/build-image.yml`:
Upstream entirely refactored this, while we changed the docker repository
to upload to and disabled the “latest” tag.
Applied the repository change to `.github/workflows/build-*.yml`, as well
as disabling native ARMv64 builds.
- `README.md`:
We have a completely different README.
Kept ours.
- `app/views/admin/settings/shared/_links.html.haml`:
Upstream refactored, we had an extra item.
Refactored as upstream did.
- `spec/controllers/api/v1/timelines/public_controller_spec.rb`:
Upstream deleted this file, to be replaced by a request spec at
`spec/requests/api/v1/timelines/public_spec.rb`.
We had an extra bit about enabling the public timelines because we have
different defaults than upstream.
Moved that bit to `spec/requests/api/v1/timelines/public_spec.rb`
Conflicts:
- `app/views/admin/settings/appearance/show.html.haml`:
Upstream enforced an uniform code style around lambdas, and glitch-soc
had a different lambda due to its theming system.
Applied the same code style changes.
- `app/views/settings/preferences/appearance/show.html.haml`:
Upstream enforced an uniform code style around lambdas, and glitch-soc
removed some code just after the lambda.
Applied the same code style changes.
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Upstream changed their README, we have our own.
Kept ours.
- `app/helpers/application_helper.rb`:
Minor code style fix upstream, on a line that is different in glitch-soc
due to the different theming system.
Applied the code style fix to our own code.
- `app/views/settings/preferences/appearance/show.html.haml`:
Code style fix on a line next to lines exclusive to glitch-soc.
Applied upstream changes.
- `yarn.lock`:
Upstream updated a dependency textually close to a glitch-soc-only
dependency.
Updated the dependency like upstream did.
Conflicts:
- `.github/workflows/build-image.yml`:
Upstream switched to pushing to both DockerHub and GitHub Container
Repository, while glitch-soc was already pushing to the latter only.
Updated our configuration to be slightly more consistent with upstream's
naming and styling, but kept our behavior.
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Updated dependencies textually too close to glitch-soc only hcaptcha
dependency.
Updated dependencies as upstream did.
- `README.md`:
Upstream updated its README, but we have a completely different one.
Kept our README, though it probably should be reworked at some point.
- `app/views/auth/sessions/two_factor.html.haml`:
Minor style fix upstream that's on a line glitch-soc removed because
of its different theming system.
Kept our file as is.
- `spec/controllers/health_controller_spec.rb`:
This file apparently did not exist upstream, upstream created it with
different contents but it is functionally the same.
Switched to upstream's version of the file.
- `spec/presenters/instance_presenter_spec.rb`:
Upstream changed the specs around `GITHUB_REPOSITORY`, while glitch-soc
had its own code because it's a fork and does not have the same default
source URL.
Took upstream's change, but with glitch-soc's repo as the default case.
- `yarn.lock`:
Upstream dependencies textually too close to a glitch-soc only one.
Updated dependencies as upstream did.
Conflicts:
- `.github/workflows/build-image.yml`:
Upstream updated `docker/build-push-action`, and we a different config
for `docker/metadata-action` so the lines directly above were different,
but it's not a real conflict.
Upgraded `docker/build-push-action` as upstream did.
- `app/javascript/mastodon/features/compose/components/compose_form.js`:
Upstream changed the codestyle near a line we had modified to accommodate
configurable character count.
Kept our change.
Conflicts:
- `.github/workflows/build-image.yml`:
Upstream changed how docker images were built, including how
they were cached.
I don't know much about it, so applied upstream's changes.
- `app/controllers/admin/domain_blocks_controller.rb`:
The feature, that was in glitch-soc, got backported upstream.
It also had a few fixes upstream, so those have been ported!
- `app/javascript/packs/admin.js`:
Glitch-soc changes have been backported upstream. As a result,
some code from `app/javascript/core/admin.js` got added upstream.
Kept our version since our shared Javascript already has that feature.
- `app/models/user.rb`:
Upstream added something to distinguish unusable and unusable-because-moved
accounts, while glitch-soc considers moved accounts usable.
Took upstream's code for `functional_or_moved?` and made `functional?`
call it.
- `app/views/statuses/_simple_status.html.haml`:
Upstream cleaned up code style a bit, on a line that we had custom changes
for.
Applied upstream's change while keeping our change.
- `config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb`:
Upstream adopted one CSP directive we already had.
The conflict is because of our files being structurally different, but the
change itself was already part of glitch-soc.
Kept our version.
* Change public accounts pages to mount the web UI
* Fix handling of remote usernames in routes
- When logged in, serve web app
- When logged out, redirect to permalink
- Fix `app-body` class not being set sometimes due to name conflict
* Fix missing `multiColumn` prop
* Fix failing test
* Use `discoverable` attribute to control indexing directives
* Fix `<ColumnLoading />` not using `multiColumn`
* Add `noindex` to accounts in REST API
* Change noindex directive to not be rendered by default before a route is mounted
* Add loading indicator for detailed status in web UI
* Fix missing indicator appearing while account is loading in web UI
Conflicts:
- `app/javascript/styles/fonts/montserrat.scss`:
Code style changes upstream, path changes in glitch-soc.
Applied upstream's code style changes.
- `app/javascript/styles/fonts/roboto-mono.scss`:
Code style changes upstream, path changes in glitch-soc.
Applied upstream's code style changes.
- `app/javascript/styles/fonts/roboto.scss`:
Code style changes upstream, path changes in glitch-soc.
Applied upstream's code style changes.
- `app/models/account.rb`:
Textual conflict only caused by glitch-soc using a different value
for character limits in a nearby line.
Applied upstream's changes.
- `app/views/statuses/_simple_status.html.haml`:
Attribute added to a tag modified by glitch-soc.
Added upstream's attributes.
- `yarn.lock`:
Upstream added/updated dependencies close to glitch-soc-only ones.
Updated/added upstream dependencies.
Conflicts:
- `app/lib/formatter.rb`:
Upstream completely refactored the formatting code and removed that file,
while glitch-soc had code for Markdown and HTML toots.
Took upstream code, glitch-soc changes will be re-implemented on top of the
refactored classes in a later commit.
- `app/models/status.rb`:
Upstream refactored status edit handling and moved code to
`app/models/concerns/status_snapshot_concern.rb`.
Applied glitch-soc's changes to that file.
- `app/serializers/activitypub/note_serializer.rb`:
Not really a conflict, just a line added too close to one modified by
glitch-soc.
Applied upstream changes while keeping the glitch-soc-modified one.
- `app/services/update_status_service.rb`:
Not really a conflict, upstream modified a line adjacent to one added by
glitch-soc.
Applied upstream changes while keeping the glitch-soc line.
- `app/views/statuses/_simple_status.html.haml`:
Upstream refactored formatting, glitch-soc changed the markup slightly.
Applied upstream changes.
- `spec/lib/formatter_spec.rb`:
Upstream completely refactored the formatting code and removed that file,
while glitch-soc had code for Markdown and HTML toots.
Took upstream code, glitch-soc changes will be re-implemented on top of the
refactored classes in a later commit.
Conflicts:
- `app/models/status.rb`:
Upstream updated media and edit-related code textually close to glitch-soc
additions (local-only and content-type).
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/models/status_edit.rb`:
Upstream changes textually close to glitch-soc additions (content-type).
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/serializers/activitypub/note_serializer.rb`:
Upstream changed how media attachments are handled. Not really a conflict,
but textually close to glitch-soc additions (directMessage attribute).
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/services/remove_status_service.rb`:
Upstream changed how media attachments are handled. Not really a conflict,
but textually close to glitch-soc additions (DM timeline).
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/services/update_status_service.rb`:
Upstream fixed an issue with language selection. Not really a conflict,
but textually close to glitch-soc additions (content-type).
Ported upstream changes.
- `db/schema.rb`:
Upstream added columns to the `status_edits` table, the conflict is because
of an additional column (`content-type`) in glitch-soc.
Ported upstream changes.
- `package.json`:
Upstream dependency (express) textually adjacent to a glitch-soc-specific one
(favico.js) got updated.
Updated it as well.
* Change how changes to media attachments are stored for edits
Fix not being able to re-order media attachments
* Fix not broadcasting updates when polls/media is changed through ActivityPub
* Various fixes and improvements
* Update app/models/report.rb
Co-authored-by: Claire <claire.github-309c@sitedethib.com>
* Add tracking of media attachment description changes
* Change poll in status edit to have a structure closer to the real one
Co-authored-by: Claire <claire.github-309c@sitedethib.com>
Conflicts:
- `db/schema.rb`:
Conflict due to glitch-soc adding the `content_type` column on status edits
and thus having a different schema version number.
Solved by taking upstream's schema version number, as it is higher than
glitch-soc's.
* Add appeals
* Add ability to reject appeals and ability to browse pending appeals in admin UI
* Add strikes to account page in settings
* Various fixes and improvements
- Add separate notification setting for appeals, separate from reports
- Fix style of links in report/strike header
- Change approving an appeal to not restore statuses (due to federation complexities)
- Change style of successfully appealed strikes on account settings page
- Change account settings page to only show unappealed or recently appealed strikes
* Change appealed_at to overruled_at
* Fix missing method error
* Remove support for OAUTH_REDIRECT_AT_SIGN_IN
Fixes#15959
Introduced in #6540, OAUTH_REDIRECT_AT_SIGN_IN allowed skipping the log-in form
to instead redirect to the external OmniAuth login provider.
However, it did not prevent the log-in form on /about introduced by #10232 from
appearing, and completely broke with the introduction of #15228.
As I restoring that previous log-in flow without introducing a security
vulnerability may require extensive care and knowledge of how OmniAuth works,
this commit removes support for OAUTH_REDIRECT_AT_SIGN_IN instead for the time
being.
* Add OMNIAUTH_ONLY environment variable to enforce external log-in only
* Disable user registration when OMNIAUTH_ONLY is set to true
* Replace log-in links When OMNIAUTH_ONLY is set with exactly one OmniAuth provider
Conflicts:
- `app/helpers/accounts_helper.rb`:
Conflict due to upstream changing how followers count is displayed while we
have an option to hide followers count.
Ported upstream change.
- `app/views/accounts/_header.html.haml`:
Conflict due to upstream changing how followers count is displayed while we
have an option to hide followers count.
Ported upstream change.
- `app/views/directories/index.html.haml`:
Conflict due to upstream changing how followers count is displayed while we
have an option to hide followers count.
Ported upstream change.
- `app/views/statuses/_simple_status.html.haml`:
Small markup change in glitch-soc, on a line that has been modified by
upstream. Ported upstream changes.
Conflicts:
- `config/webpack/configuration.js`:
Upstream updated the `js-yaml` dependency, which changed how to call it.
Those changes conflicted because that code is pretty different in glitch-soc
which has to deal with its more complex theming system.
Proceeded to the same compatibility changes in glitch-soc's code.
- `package.json` and `yarn.lock`:
Not really a conflict, just glitch-soc-specific dependencies textually too
close to some dependencies updated upstream.
Conflicts:
- `app/models/form/admin_settings.rb`:
New setting added upstream. Ported it.
- `app/views/statuses/_simple_status.html.haml`:
Upstream removed RTL classes. Did the same.
- `config/settings.yml`:
New setting added upstream. Ported it.
Conflicts:
- `app/services/remove_status_service.rb`:
Conflict caused by us having a distinc Direct timeline.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/javascript/mastodon/features/compose/components/compose_form.js`:
Conflict between glitch-soc's variable character limit and upstream
refactoring that part of the code.
Ported upstream changes.
